“The Odyssey” Rotten Tomatoes Score?

According to the latest prediction market data for the query ““The Odyssey” Rotten Tomatoes Score?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, 60+ is dominating the market with an overwhelming 97.6% chance of winning. 70+ follows in second place at 84%, while 80+ sits in third with 57.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $38.2K, reflecting intense industry interest.

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

• 60+ (97.6%): Currently commanding the highest probability, 60+ is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 98¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $2.7K in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

• 70+ (84%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, 70+ maintains a 84% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 84¢.
• 80+ (57.5%): Sitting in third place with a 57.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward 80+, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

• Alternative Options: This includes 90+ (39.5%).
• Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like 90+ are still attracting notable interest.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the displayed Rotten Tomatoes “All Critics” Tomatometer score for The Odyssey (2026) is at least equal to the specified number at 10:00 AM ET on July 20, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".

If, for any reason, the resolution data is unavailable at this market's specified end time, the resolution source will be checked until the relevant data is available. This market will resolve to “No” if no data is available by July 24, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

• The Most Overvalued Outcome 60+ currently trades at 97.6%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 83.2%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -14.4%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
• The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies 80+ as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 57.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 93.2% — yielding an impressive +35.7% EV Gap.
• Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include 90+ (EV Gap: +26.4%) and 70+ (EV Gap: +8.1%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.