
MLS: 2026 Defender of the Year
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “MLS: 2026 Defender of the Year”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Birk Risa is dominating the market with an overwhelming 34.7% chance of winning. Micael follows in second place at 30%, while Kevin Long sits in third with 29.2%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $897.1K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Birk Risa (34.7%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Birk Risa is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 35¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $133 in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Micael (30%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Micael maintains a 30% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 30¢.
- Kevin Long (29.2%): Sitting in third place with a 29.2% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Kevin Long, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~6.2%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Marcelo Silva (27.2%), Eddie Segura (25.4%), and Tristan Blackmon (22.5%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Andrew Privett are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birk Risa | 34.6% | $133 | 35¢ | 65¢ |
| 2 | Micael | 30.0% | $161 | 30¢ | 70¢ |
| 3 | Kevin Long | 29.1% | $143 | 29¢ | 71¢ |
| 4 | Marcelo Silva | 27.2% | $133 | 27¢ | 73¢ |
| 5 | Eddie Segura | 25.4% | $129 | 25¢ | 75¢ |
| 6 | Tristan Blackmon | 22.4% | $133 | 22¢ | 78¢ |
| 7 | Andrew Privett | 17.0% | $293 | 17¢ | 83¢ |
| 8 | Lalas Abubakar | 16.7% | $127 | 17¢ | 83¢ |
| 9 | Robert Voloder | 16.5% | $127 | 17¢ | 84¢ |
| 10 | Daniel Munie | 16.4% | $127 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 11 | David Brekalo | 16.3% | $388.0K | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 12 | Yevhen Cheberko | 16.2% | $133 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 13 | Tomás Avilés | 16.2% | $127 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 14 | Joel Waterman | 16.1% | $151 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 15 | Miles Robinson | 15.7% | $127 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 16 | Kamal Miller | 15.6% | $127 | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 17 | Ranko Veselinović | 15.3% | $127 | 15¢ | 85¢ |
| 18 | Maximiliano Falcón | 15.0% | $127 | 15¢ | 85¢ |
| 19 | Donovan Pines | 14.1% | $127 | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 20 | Mauricio Pineda | 14.1% | $127 | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 21 | Dave Romney | 14.1% | $148 | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 22 | Andreas Maxsø | 13.8% | $127 | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 23 | Rodrigues | 13.8% | $22.9K | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 24 | Thiago Martins | 13.6% | $154 | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 25 | Sigurd Rosted | 13.3% | $127 | 13¢ | 87¢ |
| 26 | Jack Elliott | 13.0% | $127 | 13¢ | 87¢ |
| 27 | Zac McGraw | 12.7% | $91.1K | 13¢ | 87¢ |
| 28 | Miguel Tapias | 12.3% | $127 | 12¢ | 88¢ |
| 29 | Henry Kessler | 12.2% | $127 | 12¢ | 88¢ |
| 30 | Sebastien Ibeagha | 11.9% | $127 | 12¢ | 88¢ |
| 31 | Jack Maher | 11.8% | $127 | 12¢ | 88¢ |
| 32 | Rudy Camacho | 11.7% | $215 | 12¢ | 88¢ |
| 33 | Oleksandr Svatok | 10.2% | $127 | 10¢ | 90¢ |
| 34 | Andrés Reyes | 9.9% | $3.0K | 10¢ | 90¢ |
| 35 | Justen Glad | 7.3% | $129 | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 36 | Tim Parker | 5.9% | $127 | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 37 | Dany Rosero | 5.3% | $5.2K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 38 | Maya Yoshida | 5.2% | $3.3K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 39 | Yeimar Gómez Andrade | 5.1% | $127 | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 40 | Lucas Bartlett | 4.9% | $8.4K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 41 | Jackson Ragen | 4.5% | $11.7K | 5¢ | 96¢ |
| 42 | Joakim Nilsson | 4.5% | $166 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 43 | Adilson Malanda | 4.5% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 44 | Sean Nealis | 4.3% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 45 | Jalen Neal | 4.3% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 46 | Enea Mihaj | 4.3% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 47 | Christopher McVey | 4.3% | $128 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 48 | Erik Sviatchenko | 4.3% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 49 | Carlos Terán | 4.0% | $132 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 50 | Stian Gregersen | 3.8% | $127 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 51 | Robin Jansson | 3.8% | $4.8K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 52 | Walker Zimmerman | 3.6% | $1.7K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 53 | Brendan Hines-Ike | 2.8% | $161 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 54 | Aaron Long | 2.8% | $166 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 55 | Nkosi Tafari | 2.8% | $171 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 56 | Noah Eile | 2.1% | $158 | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 57 | Gabriele Corbo | 1.4% | $3.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 58 | Matt Miazga | 1.4% | $136 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 59 | Michael Boxall | 0.9% | $127 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 60 | Jakob Glesnes | 0.8% | $347.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to the player who wins the 2026 MLS Defender of the Year award.
In the event of a tie, this market will resolve according to the official winner as determined by MLS rules. If multiple winners are announced then this market will resolve to the player whose listed last name comes first alphabetically.
If the 2026 MLS season is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026 ET, or there is otherwise no winner declared within that timeframe, this market will resolve to “Other”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from Major League Soccer; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Birk Risa currently trades at 34.7%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1.5%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -33.1%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Michael Boxall as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 1% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 2.4% — yielding an impressive +1.4% EV Gap.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birk Risa | 34.6% | 1.5% | -33.1% |
| Micael | 30.0% | 0.8% | -29.2% |
| Kevin Long | 29.1% | 20.8% | -8.3% |
| Marcelo Silva | 27.2% | 0.7% | -26.4% |
| Eddie Segura | 25.4% | 1.3% | -24.1% |
| Tristan Blackmon | 22.4% | 1.1% | -21.4% |
| Andrew Privett | 17.0% | 0.8% | -16.2% |
| Lalas Abubakar | 16.7% | 0.9% | -15.8% |
| Robert Voloder | 16.5% | 0.4% | -16.1% |
| Daniel Munie | 16.4% | 0.7% | -15.7% |
| David Brekalo | 16.3% | 1.1% | -15.2% |
| Yevhen Cheberko | 16.2% | 1.1% | -15.1% |
| Tomás Avilés | 16.2% | 0.9% | -15.3% |
| Joel Waterman | 16.1% | 0.8% | -15.3% |
| Miles Robinson | 15.7% | 1.5% | -14.2% |
| Kamal Miller | 15.6% | 0.4% | -15.1% |
| Ranko Veselinović | 15.3% | 1.4% | -13.9% |
| Maximiliano Falcón | 15.0% | 0.9% | -14.1% |
| Donovan Pines | 14.1% | 0.1% | -14.0% |
| Mauricio Pineda | 14.1% | 0.2% | -13.8% |
| Dave Romney | 14.1% | 0.2% | -13.9% |
| Andreas Maxsø | 13.8% | 0.9% | -12.9% |
| Rodrigues | 13.8% | 1.4% | -12.4% |
| Thiago Martins | 13.6% | 0.9% | -12.7% |
| Sigurd Rosted | 13.3% | 0.5% | -12.8% |
| Jack Elliott | 13.0% | 0.7% | -12.3% |
| Zac McGraw | 12.7% | 0.8% | -11.8% |
| Miguel Tapias | 12.3% | 0.2% | -12.1% |
| Henry Kessler | 12.2% | 0.2% | -12.0% |
| Sebastien Ibeagha | 11.9% | 0.7% | -11.2% |
| Jack Maher | 11.8% | 0.1% | -11.6% |
| Rudy Camacho | 11.7% | 1.5% | -10.2% |
| Oleksandr Svatok | 10.2% | 0.5% | -9.7% |
| Andrés Reyes | 9.9% | 2.9% | -7.0% |
| Justen Glad | 7.3% | 0.3% | -7.1% |
| Tim Parker | 5.9% | 0.1% | -5.7% |
| Dany Rosero | 5.3% | 1.0% | -4.3% |
| Maya Yoshida | 5.2% | 1.0% | -4.2% |
| Yeimar Gómez Andrade | 5.1% | 0.9% | -4.2% |
| Lucas Bartlett | 4.9% | 0.8% | -4.1% |
| Jackson Ragen | 4.5% | 2.2% | -2.3% |
| Joakim Nilsson | 4.5% | 0.7% | -3.8% |
| Adilson Malanda | 4.5% | 0.8% | -3.6% |
| Sean Nealis | 4.3% | 0.5% | -3.9% |
| Jalen Neal | 4.3% | 0.9% | -3.3% |
| Enea Mihaj | 4.3% | 0.9% | -3.3% |
| Christopher McVey | 4.3% | 0.9% | -3.3% |
| Erik Sviatchenko | 4.3% | 0.5% | -3.8% |
| Carlos Terán | 4.0% | 0.4% | -3.6% |
| Stian Gregersen | 3.8% | 0.9% | -2.9% |
| Robin Jansson | 3.8% | 0.5% | -3.3% |
| Walker Zimmerman | 3.6% | 0.5% | -3.0% |
| Brendan Hines-Ike | 2.8% | 1.4% | -1.4% |
| Aaron Long | 2.8% | 1.7% | -1.1% |
| Nkosi Tafari | 2.8% | 1.0% | -1.7% |
| Noah Eile | 2.1% | 1.2% | -0.9% |
| Gabriele Corbo | 1.4% | 1.4% | -0.0% |
| Matt Miazga | 1.4% | 0.8% | -0.5% |
| Michael BoxallBest EV | 0.9% | 2.4% | +1.4% |
| Jakob Glesnes | 0.8% | 0.4% | -0.4% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 28, 2026
- 09:24 PM4848xsds$0.00
Sold 8.4 Yes for Will Michael Boxall win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0
- 09:22 PM1414gjhgjk$0.00
Sold 11.8 Yes for Will Michael Boxall win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0
- 09:19 PM61613b668ef24D3A37417cb5756c5943cae761DA44.$0.11
Sold 11 Yes for Will Michael Boxall win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.01
- 09:13 PMMOMojito9$0.06
Sold 6.2 Yes for Will Michael Boxall win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.01
Jun 24, 2026
- 05:41 PM1414gjhgjk$0.15
Sold 15.2 Yes for Will Matt Miazga win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.01
- 03:26 PM61613b668ef24D3A37417cb5756c5943cae761DA44.$0.05
Sold 5.16 Yes for Will Jackson Ragen win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.01
- 03:13 PM61613b668ef24D3A37417cb5756c5943cae761DA44.$0.10
Sold 10 Yes for Will Jackson Ragen win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.01
- 11:15 AM61613b668ef24D3A37417cb5756c5943cae761DA44.$1.58
Sold 26.39 Yes for Will Zac McGraw win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.06
- 03:31 AMB4b41eAd279375742D6C2A1A2239Bdce56376411fD.$0.08
Sold 0.84 Yes for Will Zac McGraw win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.09
- 03:30 AMB4b41eAd279375742D6C2A1A2239Bdce56376411fD.$1.45
Sold 16.1 Yes for Will Zac McGraw win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.09
Jun 18, 2026
- 10:29 AMFLflexer78$0.00
Sold 67.5 Yes for Will Jakob Glesnes win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0
Jun 16, 2026
- 04:33 AMELelpatrondelaciudad$1.23
Sold 1.29 No for Will Nkosi Tafari win 2026 MLS Defender of the Year? at 0.95
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "MLS: 2026 Defender of the Year"?
As of the latest update, Birk Risa leads the field as the frontrunner with a 34.7% win probability, followed by Micael at 30% and Kevin Long at 29.2%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $897.1K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Michael Boxall as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 1% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 2.4% — an Expected Value gap of +1.4%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Birk Risa. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 34.7%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1.5%, a negative EV Gap of -33.1% that signals the contract is overpriced.
