
MLB: 2026 AL Cy Young Winner
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “MLB: 2026 AL Cy Young Winner”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Cam Schlittler is dominating the market with an overwhelming 38.5% chance of winning. Dylan Cease follows in second place at 22.5%, while Jacob deGrom sits in third with 10.3%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $142.3K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Cam Schlittler (38.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Cam Schlittler is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 38¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $18.3K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Dylan Cease (22.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Dylan Cease maintains a 22.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 22¢.
- Jacob deGrom (10.3%): Sitting in third place with a 10.3% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Jacob deGrom, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~28.8%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Parker Messick (6.2%), Tarik Skubal (2.7%), and Kevin Gausman (1.7%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Gavin Williams are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cam Schlittler | 38.5% | $18.3K | 38¢ | 62¢ |
| 2 | Dylan Cease | 22.4% | $5.6K | 22¢ | 78¢ |
| 3 | Jacob deGrom | 10.3% | $56.7K | 10¢ | 90¢ |
| 4 | Parker Messick | 6.2% | $27.1K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 5 | Tarik Skubal | 2.6% | $12.5K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 6 | Kevin Gausman | 1.7% | $1.2K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 7 | Gavin Williams | 1.6% | $1.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 8 | Garrett Crochet | 1.2% | $2.5K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 9 | Bryan Woo | 1.0% | $2.6K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 10 | Jose Soriano | 0.9% | $2.4K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 11 | Joe Ryan | 0.7% | $1.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 12 | George Kirby | 0.7% | $780 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 13 | Pablo Lopez | 0.5% | $1.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 14 | Logan Gilbert | 0.5% | $1.3K | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 15 | Cole Ragans | 0.4% | $1.3K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 16 | Ranger Suarez | 0.4% | $323 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 17 | Max Fried | 0.3% | $2.0K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 18 | Nathan Eovaldi | 0.3% | $863 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 19 | Carlos Rodón | 0.3% | $617 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 20 | Bryce Miller | 0.3% | $314 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 21 | Hunter Brown | 0.1% | $440 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 22 | Kyle Bradish | 0.1% | $399 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 23 | MacKenzie Gore | 0.1% | $740 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 24 | Gerrit Cole | 0.1% | $371 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to the player who wins the 2026 American League Cy Young Award.
In the event of a tie, this market will resolve according to the official winner as determined by MLB rules. If multiple winners are announced then this market will resolve to the player whose listed last name comes first alphabetically.
If the 2026 MLB season is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or there is otherwise no winner declared within that timeframe, this market will resolve to “Other”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from Major League Baseball; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Dylan Cease currently trades at 22.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 6.7%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -15.7%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Kyle Bradish as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.2% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 26.7% — yielding an impressive +26.5% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Hunter Brown (EV Gap: +25.3%) and Max Fried (EV Gap: +23.6%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Schlittler | 38.5% | 24.5% | -13.9% |
| Dylan Cease | 22.4% | 6.7% | -15.7% |
| Jacob deGrom | 10.3% | 14.3% | +4.0% |
| Parker Messick | 6.2% | 8.7% | +2.6% |
| Tarik Skubal | 2.6% | 18.1% | +15.4% |
| Kevin Gausman | 1.7% | 2.3% | +0.6% |
| Gavin Williams | 1.6% | 0.1% | -1.5% |
| Garrett Crochet | 1.2% | 7.0% | +5.8% |
| Bryan Woo | 1.0% | 22.0% | +21.0% |
| Jose Soriano | 0.9% | 3.9% | +3.1% |
| Joe Ryan | 0.7% | 14.6% | +13.9% |
| George Kirby | 0.7% | 0.2% | -0.5% |
| Pablo Lopez | 0.5% | 4.1% | +3.5% |
| Logan Gilbert | 0.5% | 23.4% | +22.9% |
| Cole Ragans | 0.4% | 13.2% | +12.8% |
| Ranger Suarez | 0.4% | 19.2% | +18.8% |
| Max Fried | 0.3% | 23.9% | +23.6% |
| Nathan Eovaldi | 0.3% | 13.3% | +13.0% |
| Carlos Rodón | 0.3% | 0.1% | -0.2% |
| Bryce Miller | 0.3% | 1.8% | +1.5% |
| Hunter Brown | 0.1% | 25.5% | +25.3% |
| Kyle BradishBest EV | 0.1% | 26.7% | +26.5% |
| MacKenzie Gore | 0.1% | 0.7% | +0.5% |
| Gerrit Cole | 0.1% | 0.1% | -0.1% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 30, 2026
- 06:26 AM2D2DB$0.07
Sold 7 Yes for Will Pablo Lopez win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.01
- 02:30 AMVIvivi4024$4.43
Sold 10.06 No for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.44
- 02:29 AMHOhoyuij$4.43
Sold 10.06 No for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.44
- 02:29 AMZEZeus222$4.43
Sold 10.06 No for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.44
- 02:29 AMVIVictor-Rainbow-Polymarket$4.43
Sold 10.06 No for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.44
- 02:29 AMD0D05fC5$4.43
Sold 10.06 No for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.44
- 01:58 AM2D2DB$0.00
Sold 6 Yes for Will Garrett Crochet win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0
- 12:48 AM2D2DB$0.00
Sold 6 Yes for Will Pablo Lopez win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0
- 12:48 AM2D2DB$0.00
Sold 13 Yes for Will Kevin Gausman win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0
Jun 29, 2026
- 11:44 PMZEZeus222$6.15
Sold 10.99 Yes for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.56
- 11:44 PMZYzyzyy$6.15
Sold 10.99 Yes for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.56
- 11:43 PM0X0xrezero$44.80
Sold 80 Yes for Will Cam Schlittler win the 2026 AL Cy Young Award? at 0.56
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "MLB: 2026 AL Cy Young Winner"?
As of the latest update, Cam Schlittler leads the field as the frontrunner with a 38.5% win probability, followed by Dylan Cease at 22.5% and Jacob deGrom at 10.3%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $142.3K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Kyle Bradish as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.2% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 26.7% — an Expected Value gap of +26.5%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Dylan Cease. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 22.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 6.7%, a negative EV Gap of -15.7% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Hunter Brown holds a positive EV Gap of +25.3%, and Max Fried shows +23.6%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
