
CA-16 House Election Winner
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “CA-16 House Election Winner”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Democratic Party is dominating the market with an overwhelming 93% chance of winning. Republican Party follows in second place at 6.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $81.2K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Democratic Party (93%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Democratic Party is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 93¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $49.6K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Republican Party (6.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Republican Party maintains a 6.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 7¢.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Democratic Party | 93.0% | $49.6K | 93¢ | 7¢ |
| 2 | Republican Party | 6.5% | $31.6K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the party of the candidate who wins the CA-16 congressional district seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections. The midterm elections will take place on November 4, 2026.
A candidate's party will be determined by their ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable affiliation with that party at the time all of the 2026 House elections are conclusively called by this market's resolution sources. A candidate without a ballot-listed affiliation to either the Democrat or Republican parties will be considered a member of one of these parties based on the party with which they most recently expressed their intent to caucus at the time all of the House elections are conclusively called by this market's resolution sources.
This market will resolve based on the result of the election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the United States government, specifically the Federal Election Commission (https://www.fec.gov/).
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Democratic Party as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 93% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 93.7% — yielding an impressive +0.7% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Republican Party (EV Gap: +0.4%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic PartyBest EV | 93.0% | 93.7% | +0.7% |
| Republican Party | 6.5% | 6.9% | +0.4% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 26, 2026
- 06:35 PMREresilience26$5.64
Bought 6 No for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.94
Jun 25, 2026
- 02:52 PMCOColala$1.80
Sold 30 No for Will the Democratic Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.06
Jun 24, 2026
- 06:42 PM1616r0ob$0.69
Sold 11.5 No for Will the Democratic Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.06
Jun 20, 2026
- 02:31 PMDADaveDD$45.03
Sold 48.95 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.92
Jun 17, 2026
- 12:55 AM0X0XE04A5813b7043564654A776c9189F3AE527d094f$46.50
Sold 50 No for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.93
- 12:48 AMLIlildiddy$46.50
Sold 50 No for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.93
- 12:45 AMEEeeeeeeret$372.00
Sold 400 No for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.93
- 12:43 AMSISitsToPee$132.30
Bought 2205 Yes for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.06
Jun 11, 2026
- 11:59 PMVIvirgilia$17.50
Sold 350 Yes for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.05
- 08:09 PMLIlildiddy$2.50
Sold 50 Yes for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.05
- 08:04 PM0X0XE04A5813b7043564654A776c9189F3AE527d094f$2.50
Sold 50 Yes for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.05
- 07:58 PMSISitsToPee$812.93
Bought 864.82 No for Will the Republican Party win the CA-16 House seat? at 0.94
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "CA-16 House Election Winner"?
As of the latest update, Democratic Party leads the field as the frontrunner with a 93% win probability, followed by Republican Party at 6.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $81.2K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Democratic Party as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 93% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 93.7% — an Expected Value gap of +0.7%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Republican Party holds a positive EV Gap of +0.4%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
